Skip to content
Entellex Talk to us

Financial decisions you can stand behind.

Decision Control examines the financial substance of AI-generated proposals through proprietary quantitative evaluation.

Your firm’s limits, permissions and approval requirements govern whether the connected action may proceed—with evidence to explain why.

When to consider Decision Control

Where automation gets held up.

New automation

Still doing the work manually?

The cost of a wrong action keeps the work manual.

Start with the decision you want to automate. No existing AI deployment is needed.

AI already in use

Review queues grow.

Routine checks compete with decisions that need judgement.

Controls get rebuilt.

Each new AI workflow repeats the rules, connections and review work.

Examine the financial substance before action.

Recalculate the figures.

Check amounts, allocations and cash flows against accepted data. Surface discrepancies.

Measure the exposure.

Assess the resulting concentration, balances and commitments against your firm's limits.

Test the assumptions.

Explore agreed scenarios to identify when a proposal would cross a limit or no longer meet the required criteria.

AI proposes. Your requirements govern what proceeds.

A recommendation looks reasonable. Its exposure exceeds the limit.

Consider a portfolio change that raises sector exposure from 18% to 27%, above the client's 25% limit.

Release stopped.

The quantitative layer calculates the effect. The control platform applies the limit before the recommendation is sent, with the finding and supporting evidence ready for review.

Control the action that actually runs.

Decision Control governs release on the connected action path. Changed proposals or relevant facts require a fresh evaluation.

Keep people focused on judgement.

Qualifying work can proceed automatically within the authority your firm defines. People retain the decisions that require their judgement.

Change the AI. Keep business ownership.

Keep the control layer as models change. Reassess affected analysis and requirements, then test the new action path.

The provenance chain

Follow the evidence.
Explain the decision.

Answer a customer dispute or review question without rebuilding the case across separate logs.

  1. Proposal

    What the AI put forward.

  2. Analysis

    The quantitative findings, source facts and applicable requirements.

  3. Decision

    Whether action was permitted, and why.

  4. Action

    What the connected system did.

  5. Result

    The confirmation available.

Missing evidence and unconfirmed results stay visible.

Keep work owned

Know what needs attention now.

BlockerNext ownerEvidence

Find stopped and waiting actions with the context to act. A reported success stays distinct from a confirmed result.

Build on what works

Already have rules and approvals?

Compare Decision Control's quantitative evaluation, action control and connected evidence with what your current platform provides.

Why approval must govern the action 
  • What evaluates the proposal before it is authorised?
  • Does that evaluation cover the version actually sent?
  • Can staff find the decision evidence and result together?

Compare useful work, human effort, delays and total cost.

Entellex implementation

Technology. Connections.
Expertise.

Explore enterprise deployment

Apply the quantitative layer.

We configure the financial calculations, exposure measures and scenarios for your decision, using accepted data sources and your firm's requirements.

Connect the decision to action.

We integrate Decision Control with the agreed execution paths and establish who handles exceptions.

Test beyond a clean run.

We test changed proposals, missing facts, unconfirmed actions and unnecessary stops.

Start with Decision Control

Bring a decision worth automating.

Start with existing AI or work you want to automate. We'll identify where Decision Control fits and what implementation would involve.

Talk about Decision Control

A Decision Replay evaluates example cases and returns the quantitative findings, the reasons each case proceeds, waits or stops, and any missing evidence. Live implementation connects and tests the agreed action paths.

Evaluation scope and system connections shape implementation and price.